Vilar's Radicalism #9

9) There is only one main difference between men and women: men are curious while women never are.

One main difference between men and women. Men are curious. Women never are. Only thing women might be curious are new bodily pleasures. -

Of all the qualities of man, his curiosity is certainly the most impressive. This curiosity differs basically from that of woman. A woman takes interest only in subjects that have an immediate personal usefulness to her. For example, if she reads political article in the newspaper, it is highly likely that she wants to cast a spell on some political-science student, not that she cares about the fate of the Chinese, Israelis or South Africans. If she looks up the names of some Greek philosophers in the dictionary, it does not mean she has suddenly taken an interest in Greek philosophy. It means she is trying to solve a crossword puzzle. If she is studying the advertisements for a new car, she is not doing it with a platonic interest in its technical features, but because she wants to own it.
....
Man's curiosit is something quite different. His desire for knowledge has no personal implications, is purely objective and, in the long run, is much more practical than a woman's attitude.
....
Man's curiosity is universal. There is almost nothing that does not interest him, whether it is politics, botany, nuclear physics, or God knows what. Even subjects out of his province hold his interest, such as bottling fruit, preparing cake mix or caring for a baby. And a man could not be pregnant for months without knowing all the functions of the placenta and ovaries in detail.

Men not only observe the world around them, it is in their nature to make comparisons and to apply the knowledge they have gained elseware with the ultimate aim to transform this newfound knowledge into something else, something new.

One need not emphasise the fact that practically all inventions and discoveries in this world have been made of men
....
Pg. 41-43

Women not being curious, and hence not having a HUNGER to learn and see new things, has been one of my biggest disapointments with their sex. Without curiosity, there is no intellect, no ability, no talent. The only curiosity women appear to portray is trying out new bodily pleasures. These include:

-New sex positions
-Dating Pook to try out his bodily pleasure (or another guy, or yet another guy)
-Eating stupid and absurd foods (women are annoyed that I am pleased with a decent grilled hamburger or steak most of the time).
-Sunbathing, saunas, and massages
-Sport type activities
-Why Action Dates work better than Talking Dates

Men vary in their intelligence and what they study. But all men are the same in that we are all curious... about everything... in some sort of way. Women lack this.

Women define 'adventuresome' as new sex positions, dating many guys, eating weird foods, and so on. But if a man pursues his curiosity, such as learning about space or the oceans or anything of that nature, he is condemned as a nerd.

In MGTOW sites and all, rarely do we hear men's groups subscribe 'curiosity' to men. They may apply 'smarts' but smarts are different than 'curiosity'. Have we truly understood Vilar when we keep saying men are different because of (X) and not because of simple curiosity?

It should be noted that the animal greatest known for its curiosity is the cat. While cute and fuzzy, the cat is famous for its curiosity ("Curiosity killed the cat" etc). Some Men's Rights Activists blast cats as spawns of Satan since they appear to possess the same traits as women do (selfish, lazy). But what if cats are liked by women because they possess the traits of men? Smart men are "lazy" (resting) whenever they get a chance and are always curious like the cat.

Matriarchy Circles the Wagons Around Teen Beauty

"But Pook, the Matriarchy is something bitter old men say who can't get laid. It does not exist."

Well, then, friend, can you explain this?



This is the YouTube video of the Teen Beauty making an idiotic answer. One of the YouTube commentators aptly said, "She should go straight to porn!" since she obviously has no brains and only looks.

Haha, funny video, blah blah, the world keeps spinning and there are tons of funny videos of other people. Everyone moves on in the world except the Matriarchy. After all, you can't make fun of a young pretty white girl even if she uttered stupidity on live television (where she knew she was on the stage).



Look at all the excuses and how the other woman even high fives her. They ask her for her plans and talk about her 'good grades' to deflect that she is dumb as a rock. And they ask the question to her again in which her answer is still dumb:

Question:

Why is it that one-fifth of Americans can't locate the U.S. on a map?

Answer:

"Well personally, my friends and I, we know exactly where the United States is on our map. I don't know anyone else who doesn't. And if the statistics are correct, I believe there should be more emphasis on geography."

This still isn't an answer. The question was why can't 1/5 of Americans locate the U.S. on the map and, naturally, she talks about herself (in a desperate attempt to keep showing she isn't stupid) and then says more emphasis should be on geography. That doesn't say why 1/5 of Americans don't know geography. What a dumb bitch.

Vilar's Radicalism # 10

10) Masculinity and Honor is an Artifical System designed to manipulate men.
-
Thanks to women, everythingis labelled "masculine" or "effeminate," "worthy" or "unworthy." By imbuing all they do with sentimental and emotional values to such a degree that no one can remain unaffected by them, women have created for themselves a fool's paradise. Whatever they do is pointless compared with male achievements. And since they say so themselves, why should men quibble?



Of course, if men really wanted to, they could destroy this tissue of lies and replace the terms "masculine" and "effeminate" with "hard" and "easy".


...
It is simple to analyse this vicious circle: women invent rules, manipulate men to obey them and so dominate the male sex. Of course, these rules in no way apply to women themselves. The male sense of honour, for example, is a system invented by women who loudly exempt themselves from it. They renounce the concept of honour and, as a result, manipulate men.



In a recent television series, "The Avengers", there was a scene in which two antagonists were facing each other across a billiard table, a pistol in front of each of them. It was agreed that to give them each an equal chance, they should count aloud up to three and then shoot. The hero, however, grabbed his pistol and fired at the count of two, thus saving his own life. He chose to remain outside the system and was therefore in a position to manipulate the other who, although in mortal danger, preferred to stick to a system approved by society rather than to use his own judgement.


Pg. 59-61

What is a Man? Certainly not masculinity or honor. Vilar will later define exactly what man is.

But it is true that everything that is 'masculine' and 'honorable' is disadvantageous to men and advantageous to women. It is 'masculine' to lift heavy objects. It is 'honorable' to always be nice to women. It is 'masculine' to join the military. It is 'honorable' to help the mother-in-law at all times.

Even though readers of "Manipulated Man" know how this is advantageous to women, I do not think it has yet been internalized that IT IS ALL FAKE. MGTOW are still talking about 'honor' and 'masculinity' as if it means something. It should be noted that Shakespeare opposed honor and blunt masculinity. The movers and shakers of the past, the philosophers, the poets, the musicians, the artists, would today be called 'unhonorable' and 'unmasculine'. But since there was no Matriarchy in that time period, you can see why people were attracted to such fields and tried to study them.

It is time to let it go. Let Honor go. Let 'Masculinity' (though not testosterone) go. The manipulation of Honor is not that Honor is being used to serve females, it is Honor itself is a female construction. Why should we 'honor' politicians? The only 'honor' that should be recognized is that band of brothers between soldiers. But is that really honor? Not really. That does not fit ribbons or medals.

Don't try to be masculine but try to be who you are. Those who embrace who they are, their soul, their passions, strive to be You Inc., will naturally be confident. It is those that strive towards masculinity, towards its images and cliches, that end up becoming the biggest wimps.

Prior to the 20th Century, male friendships and companionships (these are close friendships, NOT homosexuality) were depicted in literature and the world. It is interesting that the only way men are allowed to be 'close friends' is under 'Honor' as in old war buddies. Male friendship is savagely attacked as 'effeminate' (and now 'gay') because it does not help women in the slightest. This conditioning is so deeply rooted that sharing a two bedroom apartment with a guy, it is not uncommon for that guy to say, "Look! I am just trying to save money! I don't sleep with him or anything!" As the Internet and MGTOW is showing, male friendship is our greatest strength against Matriarchy. No wonder it is considered the most 'unhonorable' and most 'effeminate' thing ever!

Radicalism of Vilar

"The Manipulated Man" is the most cited book for the Enlightened Men and the most influential. When I first read it, I was tearing out my hair saying, "I cannot prove she is wrong!" It takes repeated readings and some time for the Truth to fully sink in.

Due to how perspective altering the book is, we haven't exactly gone through the book with a fine tooth comb. Vilar makes radical statements that the Men's Movement has not yet caught on. What Vilar says is as mind bending as the first time you read "Manipulated Man".

So what are these fine toothed things we may have missed? Stick around. The upcoming posts go through each one. Since the blog is going to get serious, take this time to have a laugh.

"Man: A Fun Ride With Health Insurance"

Title sums it up very well.



Just for kicks, how about another clip. I am going to steal that first line. Priceless.

Jerry Doyle a Men's Rights Activist?

One of the great things about the Internet for reading is how far curiosity will take you. A simple search, a click on a link here and there, and as you hop from page to page, you uncover an odd trail whose information often surprises.

When I listened to a Babylon 5 episode commentary via Netflix, the scene where Sheridan (sp?) gives Delenn the engagement ring had Jerry Doyle (actor who plays Garibaldi) suddenly start mocking the entire thing going how the girl would wait a couple of years, get a divorce, and get all your money taken from you, etc. I filed that in the back of my head to do a quick bio search to see if the guy had been divorced and taken to the cleaners. Sure enough, he was. Who knew that the wife/ex-wife that did was the chick that played Talia Winters? When she left the show, they married, had a kid, and divorced a couple years later.

Even weirder is finding out Doyle was a jet pilot, ran for a Republican congress seat, lost, and began his own talk show. You are so used to seeing these actors as absolute airheads that it is odd to see them doing... something interesting. Apparently, Doyle agrees with this as he made the term "grapefruit mentality" which most women, I know, think: "LOL! Let us talk about celebrities all day! Oh, that Keanu Reeves! Tee hee!". Sure enough, there is a link on his website to the National Center for Men.

Support against the legal double standards for men may not seem broad on the surface but, apparently, runs deep. It would have been interesting if Doyle won the election. A TV camera fades onto Congress and you see Garibaldi there.